Keyword case

case is documented here as a full reference entry: grammatical role, semantics, canonical form, valid example, counter-example, diagnostics, interactions, and design notes.

Visual portrait of keyword case
Syntax portrait: a code vignette centered on case.

Visual anchor: each page now has its own wiki-style profile image. It shows a small code excerpt where case appears in its most recognizable form.

Quick navigation: use the previous, summary, and next links to move through the full keyword series without manually returning to the index.

Summary

Overview

FieldValue
Keywordcase
FamilyControl flow
Suggested levelBeginner
Main neighborpick
Short rolecase is a control-flow keyword that changes the program's execution path.
Main effectcase immediately changes the execution path, whether by choosing a branch, repeating, interrupting, or terminating a flow.

The keyword case structures execution. It determines when a block opens, when a branch is chosen, when a loop continues or stops, or when an exit becomes observable.

A useful encyclopedic reading should answer three questions: where can case appear, what does it change in the block contract, and how does the compiler signal misuse?

Definition

case is a control-flow keyword that changes the program's execution path.

The keyword case structures execution. It determines when a block opens, when a branch is chosen, when a loop continues or stops, or when an exit becomes observable.

Grammatical role

Declares either a variant in a definition or a specialized branch in a pattern analysis.

This grammatical role is essential: if a reader understands the structural place of case, they already understand much of the diagnostics that will appear when it is moved or truncated.

Canonical syntax

Canonical form: `case Pattern { ... }` inside `pick`, `match`, or a related branching surface.

The canonical form matters because it gives the compiler and the reader the same reference structure. A large share of diagnostics related to case come from an abbreviated, displaced, or incomplete form.

Detailed semantics

Semantically, case reorganizes the execution path. The right question is not only 'where is it placed?' but 'which path becomes possible, impossible, or preferred from this point onward?'

In an encyclopedic reading, case should not be reduced to a dictionary definition. Its effect on scope, block shape, value visibility, control progression, and the diagnostic family it activates when misused must also be considered.

Effect on execution

case immediately changes the execution path, whether by choosing a branch, repeating, interrupting, or terminating a flow.

In other words, the presence of case is not merely syntactic: it helps the reader predict what will be executed, produced, exposed, or forbidden from this point in the program.

Valid variants

  • `case Pattern { ... }` inside `pick`, `match`, or a related branching surface.

These variants are not free synonyms. They indicate the legitimate forms from which one can reason about diagnostics, scope differences, or contract readability.

Vitte example

pick Resp {
  case Ok(value: int)
  case Err(code: int)
}

proc to_code(r: Resp) -> int {
  match r {
    case Ok(value) { give value }
    case Err(code) { give code }
    otherwise { give 70 }
  }
}

This example shows case in a nominal context. It should be read globally: where the contract begins, which values are constrained, which output becomes observable, and why the presence of the keyword is justified.

Guided reading of the example

  1. First locate the full construction that contains case, not the isolated word.
  2. Then identify which contract becomes visible because of case: type, branch, binding, module, exit, or advanced boundary.
  3. Finish by checking the observable effect produced by the construction that contains case.
  4. For a control keyword, mentally reconstruct the possible paths and the ones that become impossible.

This guided reading is intentionally closer to a reference page than to a tutorial: it helps reconstruct the exact role of case in a complete block.

Comparison with C

/* C comparison: this is usually expressed with enum tags plus switch/case. */

For this keyword, the parallel with C remains approximate. The comparison mainly indicates that in C the same idea is often spread across file conventions, operators, or less explicit control structures.

The source of truth remains Vitte grammar and semantics. The comparison with C should be read as a cultural marker, not as a parallel specification.

Recommended uses

case deserves to appear when it simplifies the reading of the block's global contract, not when it merely adds one more surface form.

When to use it

  • When case makes the block contract more explicit at first reading.
  • When it reduces the number of implicit assumptions the reader must reconstruct mentally.
  • When a branch choice, repetition, or flow exit must be made visible.

When to avoid it

  • Avoid case when another, more precise keyword already carries the block's intent.
  • Avoid case when it adds only surface noise without clarifying the contract.
  • Avoid reading or teaching it as an isolated token with no relation to the full structure.

Common pitfalls

  • Using case in a grammatical layer where it does not belong.
  • Confusing the role of the keyword with the role of the full surrounding block.
  • Showing only the nominal form and never how the contract fails.

Invalid example and diagnostic

proc bad_match(r: int) -> int {
  match r
    case 0 { give 0 }
  }
}

The pattern surface is broken because the branch form is not structurally complete.

The counter-example is not merely wrong: it is wrong in an instructive way. It shows which grammar or execution-contract assumption is no longer accepted when case is moved, truncated, or combined with the wrong context. Concretely, the specialized branch does not appear in a construction that allows it.

A good encyclopedic counter-example does not show arbitrarily broken code: it isolates the precise reason why case can no longer support the expected contract. Its teaching value is diagnostic before it is syntactic.

Common compilation errors

Typical messageUsual causeFix
unexpected token near caseThe keyword appears in an invalid form or grammatical layer.Return to the canonical form and verify placement and delimiters.
type mismatchThe keyword participates in a block whose value contract is incoherent.Realign the surrounding types, branches, or produced values.
invalid constructThe keyword is present but the surrounding construction is incomplete.Restore the missing branch, declarative part, or operands.

This table does not replace the compiler's exact diagnostics. It serves as a mental map: when case fails, the problem usually comes from an invalid grammatical form, an incoherent type contract, or an incomplete construction.

Neighbor keywords

KeywordOperational difference
pickDirect neighboring keyword: it helps explain what case does, either by contrast or by complement.

Comparison with neighboring keywords is essential on a wiki-style page: case is better understood when one knows precisely what it does not do.

Common misreadings

  • Reducing case to a local token instead of reading it as part of a full construction.
  • Explaining only the syntax and forgetting the reading or diagnostic contract it imposes.

Implementation and diagnostic notes

  • Useful diagnostics for this family usually signal an incomplete branch shape, a mistyped condition, or an illegal placement in control flow.
  • In a compiler, these keywords directly influence control-flow graph construction or intermediate representation building.

Presence in the book

See also